The test is designed to ensure that behavior introduced in Go 1.23
to garbage collect async timed channels is working correctly. If
GO111MODULE=off is set (or GODEBUG=asynctimerchan=1) Go reverts to the
Go 1.20 behavior of not garbage collecting these channels, which fails
the test.
Instead of running a test in conditions where we know it will fail,
just skip the test. A more comprehensive test does not make sense
right now because this code may go away soon.
Fixes#76948.
Change-Id: Ib186abd2ea583a06b5c246bfd6df932522cf7f1e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/732100
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Husin <husin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
CL 726964 has two bugs.
One is fairly obvious. Where there was previous a decrement of
nGsyscallNoP in exitsyscallTryGetP, it added a call to addGSyscallNoP.
Oops.
The other is more subtle. In needm we set isExtraInC to false very
early. This will cause exitsyscall (via cgocallbackg) to decrement
nGsyscallNoP when the thread never had a corresponding increment. (It
could not have, otherwise it would not have called needm, on Linux
anyway.) The fix is simple: increment nGsyscallNoP. CL 726964 actually
removed this increment erroneously. I'm pretty sure I removed it because
the first bug was the real issue, and removing this increment "fixed it"
in the context of the test. I was right that this case was subtle, but
wrong about how.
Fixes#76435.
Change-Id: I1ff1dfbf43bd4cf536b0965da370fee58e3f8753
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/732320
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Previously it would return an error only if the first call
resulted in process creation, contra the intent of the
comment at exec.Cmd:
// A Cmd cannot be reused after calling its [Cmd.Start], [Cmd.Run],
// [Cmd.Output], or [Cmd.CombinedOutput] methods.
Also, clear the Cmd.goroutines slice in case of failure to
start a process, so that the closures can be GC'd and their
pipe fds finalized and closed.
Fixes#76746
Change-Id: Ic63a4dced0aa52c2d4be7d44f6dcfc84ee22282c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/728642
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
The DotProductQuadruple methods are currently defined on Int8
vectors. There are some problems for that.
1. We defined a DotProductQuadrupleSaturated method, but the dot
product part does not need saturation, as it cannot overflow. It
is the addition part of VPDPBUSDS that does the saturation.
Currently we have optimization rules like
x.DotProductQuadrupleSaturated(y).Add(z) -> VPDPBUSDS
which is incorrect, in that the dot product doesn't do (or need)
saturation, and the Add is a regular Add, but we rewrite it to a
saturated add. The correct rule should be something like
x.DotProductQuadruple(y).AddSaturated(z) -> VPDPBUSDS
2. There are multiple flavors of DotProductQuadruple:
signed/unsigned × signed/unsigned, which cannot be completely
disambiguated by the type. The current naming may preclude adding
all the flavors.
For these reasons, remove the methods for now. We can add them
later with the issues addressed.
Change-Id: I549c0925afaa68c7e2cc956105619f2c1b46b325
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/731441
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
They operate on 128-bit groups, so name them Grouped to be clear,
and consistent with other grouped operations. Reword the
documentation, mention the grouping only for grouped versions.
Also, SaturateToUnt16Concat(Grouped) is a signed int32 to unsigned
uint16 saturated conversion. The receiver and the parameter should
be signed. The result remains unsigned.
Change-Id: I30e28bc05e07f5c28214c9c6d9d201cbbb183468
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/731501
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
This is a pain to test.
Also the original test was never executed, because it was wrong.
It looks like processors that might lack this features
include Intel 11th generation and AMD Zen 4. These might
or might not have bit 2 set in the 7th cpuid "leaf" (SM4)
which is what the incorrect test was checking; the bug
is triggered by ^VNNI & SM4. Apparently the SM4 bit is
not usually set, else we would have seen a test failure.
The "Lion Cove" microarchitecture (Arrow Lake, Lunar Lake)
appears to trigger this problem, it's not clear if there are
others. It was hard to verify this from online information.
Fixes#76881.
Change-Id: I21be6b4f47134d81e89799b0f06f89fcb6563264
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/731240
TryBot-Bypass: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
During a naive attempt to test the new runtime/secret package, I tried
wrapping the entire handshake in a secret.Do call. This lead to a panic
because some of the allocator logic had been previously untested.
freeSpecial takes p and size, but they can be misleading. They don't
refer to the pointer and size of the object with the special attached,
but a pointer to the enclosing object and the size of the span element.
The previous code did not take this into account and when passing the
size to memclr would overwrite nearby objects.
Fix by storing the size of the object being cleared inside the special.
Fixes#76865.
Change-Id: Ifae31f1c8d0609a562a37f37c45aec2f369dc6a5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/730361
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The discussion at #76477 warranted some stronger documentation about
what is expected from users of the secret package. In addition, #76764
presented a problem about when a user can expect their secrets to be
deleted.
Fix by loosening the guarantee to when all allocations from within a
secret function have been deemed unreachable. Provide some guidance for
users to steer them away from situations where allocations live on for
long after the secret function has finished executing
Fixes#76764.
Updates #76477.
Change-Id: I0cef3e7275737f32ec48f71355e588b3be26ea32
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/728921
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
For TLS 1.3, after procesesing the server/client hello, if there isn't a
CCS message, reject the trailing messages which were appended to the
hello messages. This prevents an on-path attacker from injecting
plaintext messages into the handshake.
Additionally, check that we don't have any buffered messages before we
switch the read traffic secret regardless, since any buffered messages
would have been under an old key which is no longer appropriate.
We also invert the ordering of setting the read/write secrets so that if
we fail when changing the read secret we send the alert using the
correct write secret.
Fixes#76443
Fixes CVE-2025-61730
Change-Id: If6ba8ad16f48d5cd5db5574824062ad4244a5b52
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/724120
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Reviewed-by: Coia Prant <coiaprant@gmail.com>
Some tests require enabling specific Go experiments via the GOEXPERIMENT
, like "jsonv2", "runtimesecret", or "simd".
When running these tests, we should preserve any existing GOEXPERIMENT
settings, so that multiple experiments can be tested together.
I've found this limitation while working in my own Go fork, where in
some situations I pass additional experiments to the tests that alter
the Go runtime and other core packages.
Change-Id: Ib0324cd93282f6993611dea2f0c57d00ab304a33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/730360
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
On 386, in some build modes we need to create the __x86.get_pc_thunk
symbols, to support PC-relative addressing. In some situation
the thunk symbols may already exist, e.g. loaded from a C object
in internal linking mode. In this case, we should use the exiting
symbol instead of making a new one. The current code updates the
symbol content in place but also adds a duplicated entry to Textp,
which breaks the address sorting order.
Fixes#76815.
Change-Id: Iab11106ce592dc5219b7a0e07cfafcd270661a2f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/730161
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
The go doc command now displays the comparable constraint when embedded
in an interface, matching the existing behavior for the error type.
Previously, when an interface embedded comparable, it was not shown in
the documentation and incorrectly triggered the "Has unexported methods"
message even when no unexported methods existed.
Fixes#76125
Change-Id: Idaae07fcb1dfc79b1fae374f9fc68df0052ff38e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/727100
Reviewed-by: Sean Liao <sean@liao.dev>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
