On linux/riscv64, the renameat syscall no longer exists and has been
superseded by renameat2. Use Renameat2 to implement Renameat on
linux/riscv64.
Based on a patch by Ryan O'Leary.
Updates golang/go#27532
Change-Id: I7c60c7f824750408265f67397b8ac1fa7226f425
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/157899
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Change the Pipe() function to use the pipe() syscall (which has a unique
calling convention on linux/mips) instead of using pipe2(). This allows
it to work on kernels <2.6.27 when pipe2() was introduced.
Change-Id: I088886e66b594232869d8b88c6e1a630c76188a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/126176
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Stefanovic <vladimir.stefanovic@mips.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
On linux/arm64 we used to manually define syscall numbers for some
deprecated syscalls. Most of them are unused by now anyhow. Convert the
remaining syscall wrappers using them to implement the respective
functionality using a non-deprecated syscall (in the same way glibc does
it):
- Implement EpollCreate using EpollCreate1 and additionally check
that the passed size argument is larger than 0.
- Implement Futimesat and utimes using utimensat. Also change futimesat
on the other geese to take a string instead of *byte and let the
generated wrapper do the BytePtrFromString conversion.
- Return ENOSYS from Ustat. The ustat syscall has been deprecated for a
long time in favor of fstatfs and statfs. Even glibc will deprecate
ustat in the upcoming 2.28 release [1].
[1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=NEWS;h=d51fa09544f03899b7ff5a80569db088c3c23c28;hb=HEAD#l90
Change-Id: I7ea38a3cd394b0875f17443b14e107fd9c70350d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/119655
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Looks like it's enough to just add wrappers pointing to the
corresponding SYS_FSTATAT{,64} or SYS_NEWFSTATAT syscall. Add a test to
verify that assumption which checks that the returned stat data matches
what is returned by Stat/Lstat.
Also add the AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT constant which may be used for the flags
parmeter.
Fixesgolang/go#14216
Change-Id: I73f27b483bd97d2dcf09d4b95a7957e75d194395
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/79795
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
All the implementations of NsecToTimespec and NsecToTimeval were the
same other than types. Write a single version that uses
GOARCH/GOOS-specific setTimespec and setTimeval functions to handle the
types.
The logic in NsecToTimespec and NsecToTimeval caused times before 1970
to have a negative usec/nsec. The Linux kernel requires that usec
contain a positive number; for consistency, we do this for both
NsecToTimespec and NsecToTimeval.
Follow CL 30826 which did the same for syscall.
Change-Id: Id6c6f4fef8450251447d1a5b01f35c2a36b5aeb1
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/73170
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
All implementations of these functions are identical.
Follow CL 30819 which did the same for syscall.
Change-Id: I3c78f05ea12251306f3e100a006d266154a5238e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/72378
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
On mips, "struct user" bears no relation to the actual structure used by
PTRACE_GETREGS. The real structure is "struct pt_regs" which is declared
in asm/ptrace.h
Fixesgolang/go#20338.
Change-Id: I604d27bd2b0a0903784380cbd3fa2fd9b9811fa5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/43431
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
